Ryszard Kapucinski notes in The Shadow of the Sun, a collection of reporting and essays from a
lifetime spent all over the continent of Africa: “something I had observed in
Africa before… the reaction to a thief—although there is plenty of theft
here—has an irrational dimension, akin to madness.”
Kapucinski was famous among foreign correspondents of the
era for scorning hotel bars in capital cities crammed with stringers and hacks,
instead disappearing into the bush, going to ground, and emerging weeks or
months later with unique material. He
was a keen observer of culture and human behaviors, and to read him is to get a
measured, thoughtful analysis of a range of African states and conflicts, from
the independence years to the early 90s.
For anyone who may wish to understand the much-abused continent
today—still, as it has been for decades, “an object, the reflection of some
alien star, the stomping ground of colonizers, merchants, missionaries,
ethnographers, large charitable organizations”—Shadow of the Sun is as close to a primer as I can suggest. Many times while reading it, I highlighted a
passage, amused or intrigued that Kapucinski’s observations matched my own,
even forty years later.
The theft passage in particular struck a note, as this was
something I encountered in Mbang Mboum several months ago. I tried to write about it for the blog at the
time, but it was too close, and I still felt too many conflicting emotions, so
I let it drop. Now, though, having been
reminded of it (I just finished Shadow of
the Sun this past week), I felt it might be time to try and externally
process the affair.
Let me set the scene: I returned from a weekend trip to
Ngaoundere to a somewhat disheveled house. I had left in a hurry, abandoning dirty dishes
in a bucket and leaving mud trails caked in my doorway. As is my normal practice in such situations,
I commandeered the nearest half-dozen or so children, assigned tasks all
around, and sweetened their shanghaied service with the promise of crayons and
music when they were done. Between us,
we soon had the house in order, and an hour of coloring and listening to The
Beach Boys followed. When evening came I
shooed them home, and reached into my bag to confirm if a friend had responded
to the text I had sent earlier, while walking from the bush taxi to my house.
I groped longer than expected, confused. There was no phone in my bag.
Frowning into the failing light, I brought over a solar lamp
and emptied the contents, checking every pocket in case I had mislaid it. Nothing.
Assuming I had put it somewhere while cleaning, and knowing
from experience how hard it is to see anything in my house by wan candle and
lamplight, I resolved to look the next morning when the sun was up, and put the
matter out of my mind.
The next day, despite a thorough search, there was no sign
of it—and by noon my solar lamp, which I had left in its accustomed place
beside my house to charge, was also missing.
A few of the kids who had helped me clean were in my Grassroot Soccer
club, and as we had practice that afternoon, I pulled them aside during
scrimmage. I told them to come to my
house that evening with the others who had been there the day before; once all
were assembled, I tried the gentle, liberal approach. I talked to them like they were equals,
calmly explaining what had happened and how that made me feel, and urging them,
if they had taken the phone or solar lamp or seen another kid take it, to come
and talk to me separately. There was no
need for public shaming; there was no need for punishment. I just wanted my belongings back. A line of carefully blank faces stared back
at me. No one would talk, even to
implicate another.
At this point,
disappointed with the children—I had trusted them implicitly—but unsure how to
proceed, I was about to send them all home.
My landlord Djodah, however, had come over to see what was going on. As I explained the situation, his face clouded
with rage. “You should have told me
about this when it happened!” he hissed, before turning to the children and
immediately raising his voice, bellowing at them in Mboum and shaking his fist.
I should pause
to explain the vast gulf between African and, say, Northern European
philosophies regarding child rearing. I
remember explaining to Danish friends once that I had been spanked as a child,
and seeing their horrified reactions.
“But that’s child abuse!” they protested, continuing to argue that in
Danish thought, there’s never a need to even yell at a child. They are reasoning individuals, and can be
brought to see the error of their ways through dialogue. Certainly, there is a faction of Americans
who believe this, as well—and a faction that believe in the good, old-fashioned
character-building method of sending a child out to cut their own switch. This is why spanking, in particular, is such
a controversial subject for many American parents.
Blame it on the
colonial heritage of strictly authoritarian behaviors and patterns of thought;
blame it on older, traditional social norms that still hold root in villages;
chalk it up to what you will, but child discipline here in Cameroon is severe,
always physical, and never involves reasoned dialogue. Parents routinely beat their children, even
for relatively minor peccadillos. It’s
part of an entire system of unquestioning submission to authority, and extreme,
sometimes arbitrary punishment for transgressing those boundaries.
It becomes
apparent, then, why my carefully worded appeal to the children did nothing to
solve my problem. In my eyes, I was
treating them fairly; I was assuming a priori innocence and appealing to their
empathy and innate sense of justice to get my phone back.
But here,
children are not treated that way by adults.
As many an education volunteer has heard, to their horror: “If you don’t
beat us, we won’t respect you.” In the
logic these kids grew up with, I had not raised my voice, so I could not really be upset about it. The thefts must not be such a loss to me, or
I would have been yelling and laying about with my fists.
Which is,
incidentally, exactly what Djodah began to do.
The minute he started doling out slaps, his hand cracking against the
sides of heads indiscriminately, the children changed their tune: they all,
immediately and loudly, began peaching (so to speak), singling out one among
their number.
Djodah pulled
this boy out, along with Nyari, his middle son, who was among the
children. It was unclear why he was
including Nyari, who had not been fingered by his snitching companions; I
suspect he was angry that one of his children should even be suspected of such
an act, and was (rather unjustly) trying to teach Nyari a lesson—Nyari, who had
done nothing but happen to be in the yard at the wrong time.
As the other
children melted away, he forced the two boys to their knees, fetching a long,
plastic-tubed section of electrical wire from his house. This he employed as a whip, bringing it
hissing down upon the boys’ backs and arms—they had immediately fallen into
defensive postures, covering their heads with their hands—while roaring at them
in Mboum. The boys shrieked as the blows
rained down on them, each connecting with flesh with a painful-sounding
crack. Their howls were comprehensible,
if only by their tone: denial of any relevant knowledge, and pleading for the
punishment to stop.
I milled around
in an excruciating state of indecision, horrified by the turn events had taken. On the one hand, we had been taught in our
initial training that this was a cultural norm in which we should not try to
intervene. We were free not to engage in
it ourselves, of course—education volunteers are armed with an arsenal of
alternative punishments, which shame their students without harming them,
relying on that other staple of African collective culture, public
humiliation. And yet, we were warned
that this was a battle best not chosen.
We would not change anyone’s behaviors, and would only put ourselves in
a socially unacceptable position by interfering in a family in that way. On the other hand, that’s all fine in the
abstract, but I was directly responsible for these children being beaten, and I
wanted no part in it. Once more, as
happens so often here, I was torn between respect for cultural relativity, a
desire to be integrated, and the sense that I was witnessing something that was
objectively wrong, and that I should do something about it.
Meanwhile,
quite a crowd had gathered in the compound.
I had assumed, if I had thought about it at all, that the other children
had meant to escape before Djodah’s wrath spread to them as well. It turns out they were acting as bailiffs,
summoning the jury: the entire quartier, who had been mobilized with remarkable
efficiency to witness this summary execution of justice.
Enraged beyond
reason by the failure of his methods to produce results, Djodah retired the
electrical wire in exchange for a black rubber inner tube, much thicker and
heavier than his first whip. Screaming,
his eyes bulging, he brought it slashing down on the children, whose screams
escalated. At this, tears sprang to my
eyes. I ran forward, yelling in French
and English for Djodah to back down. “I
don’t care!” I cried, starting to feel hysterical myself. “No phone is worth this, leave it, I’ll just
buy a new one! For God’s sake, stop!”
Barely had I laid
a pacifying hand on his arm when my neighbor Rougaya—a round-faced woman with
generous curves, but deceptively muscular beneath her bulge—pulled me forcibly back,
shaking her head. “You can’t stop this,”
she explained curtly, but not unkindly.
“This is bigger than you, now.
This is about having thieves in Mbang Mboum. We don’t let that happen.” When I kept protesting, she cut me off
firmly. “It’s not your decision
anymore.”
Looking around
at the faces in the crowd, I saw that I was the only one upset by the
proceedings. Everyone else was watching
Djodah’s frenzied performance, his normally jovial smile twisted into a rictus
of fury, with expressionless faces and arms casually crossed, as though
watching a mundane transaction in the marketplace. Occasionally the crowd would
murmur to each other or hiss disapprovingly at the boys’ faltering and
apparently inadequate responses to Djodah’s interrogation.
There was,
however, a system at work; while I did not understand what I was seeing at the
time, with Rougaya’s help the next day, I put together the pieces. Two older women, one the sister of the chief
and one the grandmother of the accused, had positioned themselves closest to
the boys, now writhing on the ground, clutching at their welts and covering
their faces as they shrieked. They had
been wordlessly acknowledged by everyone present (everyone except me, as I
understood neither the familial connections that awarded them these positions
nor the underlying traditional structures of justice that were at play) as,
respectively, judge and advocate.
Djodah, driven to Kapucinski’s irrational madness, dropped the inner
tube and picked up an enormous tree branch from the firewood pile beside the
outdoor kitchen. As he ran towards the
boys, hoisting this log over his head—with what intention, I’m not entirely
sure, only that it was beyond any reasonable reaction—these two women finally
intervened. One, the grandmother and
acting counsel of the thieving boy, put herself bodily in Djodah’s path,
putting out her arms to restrain him and interceding rapidly in Mboum. The other gently took the wood out of his
hands, laid it on the ground, and addressed first Djodah then the crowd, who
immediately began to disperse. It amazed
me that women could have that kind of influence in a generally misogynistic,
conservative Muslim society; I imagine this traditional system of village
justice may predate Islam, but here I am straying into conjecture. It is interesting, however, that the imam was
not called to judge the proceedings, while the absent chief’s closest relative—woman
though she may be—was.
The gist of her
decree was that the matter should be adjourned for the evening, and that the
boy would receive further punishment from his family until the stolen objects
were produced. His grandmother confirmed,
Rougaya translated, that they would not spare the rod, and frog-marched her
wayward progeny out of the compound.
And as quickly
as that, it was done.
Two days later,
Djodah happily presented me with the solar lamp. The phone, it was eventually determined, had
been sold on a subsequent market day to someone from Ngaoundere. The boy, I assume, was punished again—although
what became of his ill-begotten gains, I was never told. I bought a new phone. I laboriously tracked
down my contacts again. The affair blew over.
I worried that
Nyari and his older brother Nzika would despise me for my instigation of the
punishment, but to my relief they didn’t seem to hold any resentment towards me
at all. As Rougaya had tried to explain,
this was never understood to be a personal problem; it was a problem for the
whole community. In a village where no
one locks their doors—if, indeed, their mud huts have locks, or doors for that
matter—theft cannot be tolerated. There
are no police here; and at any rate, no one was thinking of this as a question
of law. This was a question of basic
social structure and the natural laws that must exist for men to live together,
and if I sound like I’m getting all Rousseau on you, well, it passed through my
mind in the weeks following the incident.
I’m still not
comfortable with the thought that I instigated the brutal lashing of two
children, even if one of them was confirmed to have been a burglar. The kids may not have seen the affair as
being at my bidding—a theft had been identified; of course the community had to
act as they did—but I wonder if I shouldn’t have intervened earlier, or made
stronger my objections. After all, I was
the plaintiff here; could I really not have forced Djodah to cease, if I had
thrown myself in front of him? I might
not have gotten my solar lamp back, if I had obstructed this frontier justice
from its path—but I wonder if any physical possession was really worth the pain
I inadvertently inflicted on a boy.
Where do cultural differences end, and questions of basic human rights
start? On the other hand, if this is how
justice is always meted out here, and if it works for this community in this
setting, who am I to step in and say what should or shouldn’t be done? “ Spare
the rod, spoil the child”? Do I really
have a better solution?
I remember
reading somewhere—I think in a New Yorker
fiction piece—the quotation, “Life is an unanswered question.” It struck me as pretentious at the time, but
I’m becoming more comfortable with it as a philosophy; or at least with the
slightly modified, “Life is a series of unanswerable questions.”
No comments:
Post a Comment